Theresa Pearson`s Case Analysis

Insert surname 2

TheresaPearson`s Case Analysis

The utilitarian theory can be used to justify the decision thatTheresa’s parents and the doctors made since they wanted to helpother infants that might be in need of various organs. Theutilitarian theory illustrates how something is good if it benefits awide range of people. Hence, something will be morally unacceptableif it fails to help others. In this case, Theresa’s parents thoughtthat their baby’s organs might be used in some other importantmedical initiatives. In fact, their child did not have a workingbrain, and that meant that she would suffer nearly all her life. Thedecision to volunteer her body organs was a way of helping theinfants that needed them (Nair‐Collins,38). For instance, the Theresa would have died within a short periodsince most infants with anencephaly often do not last longer. Hence,they believed that it was much better to help the infants that mightneed the body organs instead, of undergoing the pain of losing her.

I will support the lawyers since Theresa’s parents failed to followthe required approach needed in harvesting the body organs asexpected. More specifically, the fact that the parents and thephysicians caused her immediate death just because they wanted tobenefit others reveals how immoral they are. It is really frustratingthat the parents were reluctant in following a moral procedure inhelping the other infants (Nair‐Collins,42). In the end, the body organs had deteriorated, and that preventedthe physicians from using the body organs in any transplant. All inall, their procedure ended up being useless since they only killedTheresa for nothing, and her body organs did not benefit any otherinfant as they had planned earlier.

Works Cited

Nair‐Collins, Michael.&quotTaking science seriously in the debate on death and organtransplantation.&quot Hastings Center Report 45.6 (2015):38-48.