Searching and Critiquing the Evidence

Searchingand Critiquing the Evidence

Searchingand Critiquing the Evidence

Thearticles that are being analyzed aim at enhancing the level ofnursing care offered in health institutions in the United States. Thearticles provide effective evidence for proper management oftraumatic brain injury using the tidal wave theory.

  1. How Selected Literatures Strengthen the Research Problem

Barbosaet al. (2012) strengthens the research evidence by estimating thepopulation that is affected by the traumatic brain injury condition.In the United States, approximately 1.1 million individualsexperience mild traumatic brain injury every year. Alice (2016)improves the research evidence by explaining the application of thetidal model in the gradual treatment process of traumatic braininjuries. Center for Neuro Skills (2016) enhances the researchevidence. This is by providing effective measures for managing mildtraumatic brain injuries. Adam et al. (2015) improves the theoreticalframework by illustrating the challenges that clinicians experiencewhen diagnosing and treating mild traumatic brain injuries. Thehealth sector does not have standardized treatment methods for thecondition.

  1. Prevalent Levels of Evidence

Traumaticbrain injury is a common factor for getting admission into thetraumatic centers of the emergency department. The article hassufficient evidence for managing the traumatic brain injurycondition. All patients that are suspected to have brain injuriesundergo the brain CT scan (Barbosa et al., 2012). Alice (2016) showsthe prevalent level of evidence in the research by using researchfindings in the effective management of mental health. Medicaltreatment procedure is an important evidence for patient recovery(Center for Neuro Skills, 2016). The patient and physician shouldreview pain medications so as to minimize or preventmedication-related dependencies. Adam et al. (2015) explains thatinsufficient understanding of the natural history and processes ofthe traumatic brain injuries cause inconsistencies in the treatmentprocedures.

  1. Why the Evidence Level is Most Prevalent

Thelevel of presented evidence is prevalent because it affects manypeople in the society. Traumatic brain injury involves the acutealteration of brain function as a result of external blunt force(Barbosa et al., 2012). Alice (2016) explains that patients recoverfrom traumatic brain injuries using the power of their voice. Byusing personal stories, language, and experience, individuals findmeaning in their lives. The research evidence is very prevalentbecause it ensures gradual progress of the patient with minimallong-term medications (Center for Neuro Skills, 2016). Researchevidence indicates that there is a significant overlap between thetraumatic brain injuries and other health disorders for example,cognition, personality, or behavior disorders (Adam et al., 2015).

References

Adam,M. et al. (2015). “Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.”Psychiatric Times. Retrieved fromhttp://www.psychiatrictimes.com/special-reports/management-mild-traumatic-brain-injury

Alice,P. (2016). “Tidal Model.” NursingTheory.Retrieved fromhttp://www.nursing-theory.org/theories-and-models/barker-tidal-model-of-mental-health-recovery.php

Barbosa,R. et al. (2012). “Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Evaluation andManagement.” Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.Retrieved from https://www.east.org/education/practice-management-guidelines/mild-traumatic-brain-injury,-evaluation-and-management-of

Centerfor Neuro Skills. (2016). “Treatment of Mild Traumatic BrainInjury.” Retrieved from http://www.neuroskills.com/brain-injury/treatment-of-mild-traumatic-brain-injury.php