Louvhas a very deep meaning when he talks about nature deficit disorder.This as seen in the book refers to the disconnection that people havecontinued to have on nature. With time, people have been seen to beless sensitive about being aware of what nature is all about anddisregard what threats are posed ahead of time. As research shows,even the most educated are not well connected to nature. An interviewthat has been conducted on a university student proves it all. Thestudent proves it too difficult to merely mention the various typesof trees that are found in the world. This is seen to be contributedin a big way by the level of literacy that has hit the world(Atran, & Medin, n.p).The more the educated the people seem to be, the more detached theyappear to be about the nature.
Manypeople have been seen to prefer to stay in a secluded place wherethey don’t directly interact with nature. Most of them evenconsider the environment as a distraction to the lives. They,therefore, do not take any measures to preserve or even conserve thenature. As Louz continues to explain, the detaching from nature is acontinuous process that people have continued to endorse ion theirlives. The contradiction hence comes in. How then do people talkabout continuous progress yet there is that kind of nature detaching.This is well described by the fact that people are rushing to amasswealth to them more than they are ready to improve and conserve thenature. In fact, ignorance has been cited as one of the major factorsbehind the nature deficit disorder. This trend is quite worrying.
Howthe has developed
Accordingto Louv, various aspects are behind the development of the nature ofdeficit disorder. This has mainly been contributed to by theignorance by the people over the years about the nature. People havewith time developed the aspect of not caring what is not personallyrelated or associated with them. In this regard, they have continuedto detach from nature by not appreciating what it is meant for andwhat it is all about (Atran,& Medin, n.p).As an example, the global warming has not been appreciated by manypeople in the world as a big challenge. This has led to the issuebeing taken for granted. Efforts to correct the menace prove to befruitless as less of the affected people are ready to sacrifice theirtime to address what they refer to as fictions.
Theeducation system has with time lead to the nature deficit disorder.As it has been witnessed, the education system continues to loosenthe grasp of the nature in which the children are being brought upin. As the parents leave their children in the care of the educationsystem, they lose it all. The system aims at improving the knowledgeof the kids on one aspect of being successful in life. However, onthe other side, the system fails to recognize and appreciate theimpact that nature has on the lives of the educated kids. There comesin the controversy of what development is usually described from timeto time. This has been proven in facts provided about universitystudents who do not understand the different types of trees.
Researchdata exist that support the reality of Louv`s proposal
Asit has been by passed in the above discussion, quantifiable dataexist that explains the reality of what Louv claims. The data thathas been provided in the book plainly and clearly confirms thatLouv’s proposal is true and real.
Tobegin with, research has been conducted on a university student. Theinterview involved asking if the student knows the different types oftrees. The student starts so well by naming such trees as oak,cypress, and pine. He, however, spoils it all when he talks about theChristmas tree as one of the types of trees. In addition to the typesof trees, the student argues that he can’t think of plants that arenot trees. He, however, gets down and provides biological terms ofthe plants such as gymnosperms. However, these prove not to be theactual name of the plants as it is expected. This brings about thedoubt that Louv has on the aspect of people being in touch withnature. This indicates that the education system does not take intoaccount the aspects of nature. Less is being gained in theeducational institution regarding the nature.
Inaddition to the above discussion, the development agenda has beenbrought out as one of the aspects supporting the proposal by Louv. Inthis regard, research shows that people are with time detaching fromnature. They consider knowledge about some issues as irrelevant. Forexample, more positives have been achieved in the recent past. Suchpositives include the increased knowledge about the ecosystem. On theother side, the aspects of the conservation of the ecosystem are nottaken with the seriousness that the same calls for (Atran,& Medin, n.p).People feel that taking the aspects of nature as part of their livesis more of wasting time. They consider this as wastage of preciousmoment that would rather be used for the physical development.Failure to consider having time to think and attend the nature meansthat nature deficit disorder is extrapolated.
Howdoes the nature experience differ from that of the computer, TV?
Thenature experience differs from that of the TV and the computer invarious ways. Such include the following. Nature experience isunbiased regarding the aspects of nature. Experiencing the nature ononeself brings about the actual and factual understanding of what thenature is all about. One is left to have the first-hand informationabout nature and what it all entails. As this happens, the aspect ofone being able to appreciate what is the real condition of the worldis more enhanced.
TVand computers, on the other hand, are known to manipulate issuesabout nature. They are technologically put into use and hence theyhave the capability of manipulating what is not possible in reallife. The TVs and the computers will present the nature as one thatcontinuously improves and one whose beauty is far from fading.However, this is not usually the case on the ground.
Natureexperience is more convincing than the technological experience. Thenature one is actual and real. A true understanding of how nature isbrought about the need to push the agenda to take care of nature aswell as the surrounding (Atran,& Medin, n.p).On the other hand, the computer and TV experience are moremanipulated. However, it is not likely to lead to any action as thisis seen to be repeated from time to time. Viewers get used to theusual adverts about the nature and hence can’t make sound decisionson how to improve it.
Natureexperience is more refreshing than the computer and the TVexperience. The nature experience is brought about by the fact thatthe particular individual is physically involved in the activitiesthat are around the surrounding. The experience brings about a bettermemory of what nature is all about. The TV experience is not asrefreshing as the nature one. This is because only some parts of thebody are actively involved in watching (Atran,& Medin, n.p).This means that the larger part of the human body is left out in theexperience that is passing around.
Thenature experience remains for a longer time in the mind of the personwho experiences it. This implies that one is not able to forget whathe has physically interacted with. This is the complete opposite ofthe TV and the computer experience. In the wake of the computers, theexperience gained can easily be forgotten. Also, the time that theexperience is gained is limited. Also, one does not involve theentire body anatomy directly to the experience. This means that it isvery easy to forget the TV experience than it is to forget the Natureexperience.
TheTV experience exposes some sought of biases. This is seen in the waythat manipulation is done to entice and appeal the viewer. This isdifferent from the nature experience where the experience is firsthand. Manipulation is not possible as one experience what nature hasprovided.
HealingPower of getting back to nature
Gettingback to nature brings about a healing power. This is well seen in theimpact that is brought about to the people’s lives and their socialstatus. The first healing power that can be achieved is the aspect ofreduced stress. The reduction of stress is usually brought about bythe aspect of different natural smells, tastes, looks, and sounds.This has been associated with the effect of reducing stress byallowing one to calm down (Kronenfeld,n.p).This, in turn, brings about that feeling of elevated moods. Suchmoods improve the activeness of people in the various activities thatthey carry about.
Also,the aspect of getting back to nature makes people turn to the normallife system of actual time to sleep and wake up. Nature provides thesunlight that guides when it is actual time to wake up as well as thetime to sleep. This provides people with ample time to work as wellas ample time to rest. Quality sleep brings about relaxing effectthat enhances effectiveness that is brought about by the activenature of such people.
One’sattentiveness is increased when one is out in nature. Being out innature gives one time to reflect on his life as well as problems. This brings about healing as one has the opportunity to think underno pressure. One gets a mind time that he can make sound decisions inwhatever problems he might be getting through. The healing powerbrought about by this is associated with good health.
Itcan also be noted that the healing power is gotten from the aspect ofbetter satisfaction. This is seen as the beauty of nature bringsabout the good satisfaction of the body and mind. The cool naturehence brings about a healing power that has sort of medicinal value.When one sees the various aspects of nature, he becomes healthier andis less prone to such diseases as stroke.
Waysof turning back to Nature according to Louv
Louvsuggests various ways in which people can get back to nature. One ofthe ways that he suggests is the act of reviewing the way we reasonand the aspect cultural speaking. In this, he suggests that peopleshould improve their style of reasoning about nature and take it assomething useful to them (Kronenfeld,n.p).He suggests that the culture that people assume ought to accommodatethe various aspects of nature. Every culture ought to incorporate thenature in the day to day activities as part of their lives.
Also,Louv states that people need to reflect on the consequences that theyhave had to endure due to the aspect of losing a touch with nature.This challenges the people to determine what suffering they have hadto go through by lacking the grasp with nature. This presents itselfas an opportunity for many people to detach from ways that haverendered them to suffer.
Hesuggests that people also need to appreciate the value that naturebrings about in their lives. This ensures that lives will be betterwith the incorporation of nature in their dealings. Appreciating thenature would be done by involving in activities that incorporateinteraction with it directly. The above suggestions by Louv would getpeople back to nature in a convenient way.
Examplesof practical projects that try to get children back to nature
Severalways are at disposal to bring children back to nature. Such includeensuring that the children bodies get into contact with the earth.This can be enhanced by getting the off their shoes so that theytouch the ground with their bare foots. This increases their love fornature.
Gettingthe kids to play with the dirt often creates an impression that makesthem love the nature as much as possible. This enhances their abilityto identify with nature as a nice environment where they can relaxtheir minds and have time to relax.
Anotherway of getting kids back to nature is by bringing nature into thehouse. This is shown in that the nature of plants are brought to thesight of the kids(Kronenfeld, n.p).As this happens, the kids will develop a sense of love for the plantsin their bound and hence will reap the positive effects. This is amajor and a widely proven way of getting back to nature.
Enablingthe kids to wake up to nature will also enable them to come back tonature. This is enhanced, may by opening windows for them when theywake up, and letting them to breath in the different smells as wellas listen to the various sounds.
Whyis it important for the future to address the problem?
Itis important for the future to address the problem of detaching fromnature. This is because nature has been seen to add a lot of value tothe lives of human beings. The major aspect that is contributed bynature is good health. Getting back to nature brings about healing tothe people. It is fundamental for people to think about the future,as the future depends on the present. Nature represents the presentand future health situation of the people.
Atran,Scott, and Douglas L. Medin. Thenative mind and the cultural construction of nature.Cambridge: Mit Press, 2008.
Kronenfeld,David B. Acompanion to cognitive anthropology.Vol. 16. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.