Comparison of Two Persuasive Writings


Comparisonof Two Persuasive Writings

Comparisonof Two Persuasive Writings

Thereare many types of essays written by learned and experienced authorsfor the purpose of passing a given message. This is to say that,essay writing is essential for individuals or rather scholars as iteducates and gives them more knowledge of a given topic. As peopleread articles, it is important for them to be well versed in thestructural organization and language for them to be convinced by theauthor’s message (Hamilton, 2011). According to researchers, thework of various authors is appreciated by the way they use theirimagination, and they arrange their pieces of work (Hamilton, 2011).Personally, the essay ThisIs Not Who We Are,written by Naomi Shihab Nye convinces me more compared to theRobertson Davies’ piece titled AFew Kind Words for Superstition.This is because the author expresses her thoughts on the issue ofcultural diversity in a sad tone and borrows various styles ofliterature to make the reader feel the depth of the situation. Bothauthors offer readers literature pieces that are appealing,entertaining and fun to read. In this essay, the Naomi article willbe briefly discussed and its structural organization and languagecompared to Robertson’s article.

Tobegin with, the Naomi talks about how the people of her race arebeing treated in a way that is unjust and intolerable. She is unhappyof the cultural diversity and racism that is practiced in America(Naomi, n. d). Besides, the writer feels uncomfortable even to buy ahamburger in a franchise in one of the biggest cities for her child.She then listens to the radio only to hear one of her famousviolinists, who coincidentally is also an Arab-American just likeher. She is taken aback, and she thinks of the struggles she had gonethrough with her family in the country. Her father had lost his homesome time back, but they still had hope for a better future. Theauthor continues by stating how life in their home was filled withvigor and music. Moreover, change was the central theme they hopedfor in their segregated home. A chance to be treated equally andjustly in the community is all they wished for as opposed to wealthand other material things.

Theessay aims to reach both the racially beleaguered and the oppressors’audience. The author is chiefly concerned with the current prejudicesituation, taking place in her society. As such, all she wishes topass across is the message of hope and the importance of peopleliving in peace and harmony. This can be seen where she mentions herlate great-grandmother who had lived for more than a century (Naomi,n. d). The author explains how her grandmother handled situationswith a lot of wisdom and genuine heart, yet she could neither readnor write. Even though she was old, her Palestinian grandmother waspatient, hopeful, and a loving individual, who was well known andesteemed by many (Naomi, n. d). Apart from this, the author continuesto support her argument and involves the reader with various poemswritten by well-known scholars expressing their thoughts on peace. Inaddition to this, she uses different literary styles such asmetaphors and irony.

Theuse of these styles is to make the readers understand more about whatis being discussed in the essay (Hamilton, 2011). The author usesmetaphors a couple of time and brings objects into life, making herpoint easier to interpret. In the first paragraph, she writes “Acalm washes over me” to mean she became more tranquil and relaxedon hearing the song of her favorite violinist. Furthermore, she usesirony in her work when she claims that children are the ones thatgive a message of peace and act as role models though this was thework for the grownups. This leaves the readers in a perpetual stateof wonder, and they feel the tone of the author as she states hergrievances.

Contrastingly,the essay entitled AFew Kind Words for Superstitionis primarily a research on various forms of misconceptions in thesociety (Robertson, n. d). In the article, the essayist offersexamples of different superstitious cases witnessed by individualsfrom diverse parts of the world. The essay written by Robertson isthe least convincing because the topic he writes about has differentopinions. The author has no proof of whatever he is talking about anduses other people’s views on the subject to come up with a generalunderstanding, and conclusions.

Conversely,this is not the case in the treatise discussed by Naomi as she usesexamples of her life experiences and explains her views in a moreconsiderable and persuasive manner (Naomi, n. d). Another significantcomparison between the two is the hook whereby in Naomi’s piece ofwork, she immediately captures the attention of the reader by statinghow uncomfortable she is in public places due to racism and makes thereader want to know more about the character. This is not recognizedin the introduction of Robertson’s work since he goes on directlyto the exploration of superstition in the paper (Robertson, n. d).Last but not least, the title used by Naomi in her essay is moreappealing, and anyone that comes across such a title immediatelybecomes curious to know what she has written. In contrast,Robertson’s title automatically prepares the reader early on whatthe essay is all about.

Inconclusion, both articles are interesting, fun to read, and theauthors use various literary styles in putting their points across.They also employ simple language to ensure that they deliver a clear,concise, and detailed message to the audience. However, the twodiffer in the structural organization since one is all about researchwhile the other talks about actual life experiences.


Hamilton,C. L. (2011). Anthemguide to essay writing.London: Anthem Press.

Naomi,S. N. (n. d). ThisIs Not Who We Are.

Robertson,D. (n. d). AFew Kind Words for Superstition.