A Qualitative Article Critique

A QUALITATIVE ARTICLE CRITIQUE 5

AQualitative Article Critique

AQualitative Article Critique

ResearchDesign

Thepaper seeks to analyze qualitatively a research conducted to examinethe effects of living with pulmonary hypertension. Yorke, Armstrong,and Bundock (2014) assert that little research has been undertaken inthe area. The authors examine the experiences of individuals livingwith the condition. It was designed to utilize semi-structured andone-to-one interviews where the researchers conducted the study fromthe home of the participants. The study was qualitative with theresearchers using semi-structured interviews to collect data.

Samplingand Participants Recruitment

Recruitmentof participants was done through the Pulmonary HypertensionAssociation (PHA) UK membership list that has close to 3,000 members(Yorke, Armstrong, &amp Bundock, 2014). Prior information wasprovided about the prospective study. The participants engaged in theexercise through voluntary means. Sampling was undertaken by thevolunteers to enhance maximum variation of the members. Male andfemale patients of different ages participated in the exercise. Thereis a great connection between the data collection, findings, anddiscussions given by the authors.

DataCollection Method

Thewriters used an in-depth interview guide to help in the collection ofdata about patients’ experiences. The discussion centered onvarious questions such as feelings, thoughts, and experiences afterdiagnosis with the condition. The questions also covered the opinionof the living with pulmonary hypertension regarding the nature ofcare and effect on other people such as friends and family. The guidewas organized after deliberations with nurses and patientrepresentatives in the UK. It is notable that the interviews lastedbetween 40 and 100 minutes (Yorke, Armstrong, &amp Bundock, 2014).The author recorded the information for further reference andinterrogation.

DataAnalysis

Thematicanalysis was utilized to recognize codes as well as create themes forthe interview data. In undertaking the analysis, one author wouldidentify the initial codes before passing to the second researcher.Thirty patients living with pulmonary hypertension were recruited forthe study, and presented in five themes (Yorke, Armstrong, &ampBundock, 2014). The approach is appropriate to help in understandingthe nature of experiences for patients with pulmonary hypertension.The research has personal stories given by the respondents abouttheir experiences after diagnosis with pulmonary hypertension.

Identificationof themes was made independently. The researchers examined thetranscripts thoroughly, line by line and paragraph by paragraph whilechecking the appropriate statements and codes depending on thetopics. Later, the investigators examined the similarities anddifferences before sorting the codes into various categories.Further, cross-examination of data by the two analysts made itpossible to identify the inaccuracies and incorrect information thatare likely to affect the findings arising from the study.

Trustworthinessand Dependability of the Methods

Toenhance the credibility of the exercise, the authors used variousfeatures during sampling of participants. Among the characteristics,include the length of diagnosis, geographical areas, and specialistcenters in the UK. The authors got assistance from the PHA UK staffin recognizing participants who had met the selection criteria(Yorke, Armstrong, &amp Bundock, 2014). Financing of the project byPHA UK is an indication of its trust to the researchers and thenecessity for the study. The inclusion of personal quotes in the caseenhances the trustworthiness of the exercise and findings. The studyis well researched, with the contribution of staff from PHA UK toassist the canvassers. The findings support the claims from previousstudies hence, they are dependable and trustworthy to scholars andpractitioners in the medical field.

Reference

Yorke,J., Armstrong, I., &amp Bundock, S. (2014). Impact of living withpulmonary hypertension: A qualitative exploration. Nursing&amp Health Sciences,16(4),454-460.